Identifying learning obstacles in proof construction for geometric transformations: Conceptual, procedural, and visualization errors

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Talisadika Serrisanti Maifa
Didi Suryadi
Siti Fatimah

Abstract

This study investigates learning obstacles encountered by pre-service mathematics teachers in constructing proofs for geometric transformations, a topic that has not been extensively examined in previous research. In contrast to prior studies, this research identifies specific types of errors, as well as their interconnections, representing the first step in uncovering learning obstacles. The study followed the four steps of phenomenology: bracketing, intuiting, analyzing, and describing, using written tests and interviews to explore students' errors. The findings reveal that errors can be categorized into three types: visualization errors, conceptual errors, and procedural errors. The analysis of their interconnections revealed that conceptual errors were the primary factor contributing to both procedural and visualization errors. Analyzing these errors led to the identification of epistemological obstacles, which manifested when participants struggled to apply fundamental concepts—such as injectivity, surjectivity, and bijectivity—to more complex tasks. Therefore, the study concludes that the primary learning obstacle discovered is an epistemological obstacle.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##


Section
Articles

References

Aktaş, G. S., & Ünlü, M. (2017). Understanding of eight grade students about transformation geometry: Perspectives on students' mistakes. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(5), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i5.2254

Alase, A. (2017). The interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A guide to a good qualitative research approach. International journal of education and literacy studies, 5(2), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.2p.9

Anwar, L., Mali, A., & Goedhart, M. (2021). The effect of proof format on reading comprehension of geometry proof: The case of Indonesian prospective mathematics teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(4), em1952. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10782

Araújo, C. H. D., & Menezes, D. B. (2022). Mathematical proof and epistemological obstacles: Assumptions of the methodological teaching proposal of the Fedathi sequence. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(4), em0707. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12315

Aulia, I. R., Azizah, D., & Hoiriyah, D. (2023). Analysis of student difficulty in solving geometry transformation problems at UIN syekh ali hasan ahmad addary padangsidimpuan. Logaritma: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains, 11(2), 271–278. https://doi.org/10.24952/logaritma.v11i02.10292

Beeler, N., Ziegler, E., Volz, A., Navarini, A. A., & Kapur, M. (2024). The effects of procedural and conceptual knowledge on visual learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 29(4), 1243–1263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-023-10304-0

Braithwaite, D. W., & Sprague, L. (2021). Conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, and metacognition in routine and nonroutine problem solving. Cognitive Science, 45(10), e13048. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13048

Brousseau, G. (2002). Epistemological obstacles, problems, and didactical engineering. In G. Brousseau, N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield (Eds.), Theory of didactical situations in mathematics (pp. 79–117). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47211-2_6

Budiarto, M. T. (2015). Geometri transformasi [Transformation geometry] (8 ed.). Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Darhim, D., & Rasmedi, A. (2014). Geometri transformasi [Transformation geometry]. Universitas Terbuka.

Dewi, R., Riyadi, R., & Siswanto, S. (2022). Students’ epistemological obstacles in statistical problems Proceedings of the 2nd National Conference on Mathematics Education 2021 (NaCoME 2021),

Fardian, D., Suryadi, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2025). A praxeological analysis of linear equations in Indonesian mathematics textbooks: Focusing on systemic and epistemic aspect. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(1), 225–254. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i1.pp225-254

Fitriani, N., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2024). Didactical design of learning mathematics in reducing students’ learning obstacles. In AIP Conference Proceedings, (Vol. 2622, pp. 140010). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0133555

Greening, N. (2019). Phenomenological research methodology. Scientific Research Journal (SCIRJ), 7(5), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.31364/SCIRJ/v7.i5.2019.P0519656

Indahwati, R. (2023). Student’s difficulties in transformation geometry course viewed from visualizer verbalizer cognitive style. SIGMA, 9(1), 1–8.

Jatisunda, M. G., Suryadi, D., Prabawanto, S., & Umbara, U. (2025). Pre-service mathematics teacher conducting prospective analysis: A case study on practice didactical design research. Infinity Journal, 14(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i1.p21-44

Kandaga, T., Rosjanuardi, R., & Juandi, D. (2022). Epistemological obstacle in transformation geometry based on van Hiele's level. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(4), em2096. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11914

Kribbs, E. E., & Rogowsky, B. A. (2016). A review of the effects of visual-spatial representations and heuristics on word problem solving in middle school mathematics. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2(1), 65–74.

Kuncoro, K. S., Suryadi, D., Dahlan, J. A., & Jupri, A. (2024). Praxeological analysis in Indonesian and Singaporean mathematics textbooks: An understanding geometrical similarity by students. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(4), 1197–1218. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i4.pp1197-1218

Kurniasih, M. D., & Handayani, I. (2017). Tangkas geometri transformasi: Cepat tepat menguasai geometri transformasi [Agility in transformation geometry: Quickly and precisely master transformation geometry]. Rajawali Pers.

Kusuma, A. B., Hanum, F., Abadi, A. M., & Ahmad, A. (2024). Exploration of ethnomathematics research in Indonesia 2010-2023. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p393-412

Kusuma, A. B., & Setyaningsih, E. (2015). Peningkatan kemampuan representasi matematis mahasiswa menggunakan media program geogebra pada mata kuliah geometri transformasi [Improving students' mathematical representation skills using GeoGebra program media in transformation geometry courses]. Khazanah Pendidikan, 8(2).

Maifa, T. S. (2019). Analisis kesalahan mahasiswa dalam pembuktian transformasi geometri [Analysis of student errors in proving geometric transformations]. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v3n1.p8-14

Maknun, C. L. l. i., Rosjanuardi, R., & Jupri, A. (2022). Epistemological obstacle in learning trigonometry. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 14(2), 5–25.

Napfiah, S., & Sulistyorini, Y. (2021). Errors analysis in understanding transformation geometry through concept mapping. International Journal of Research in Education, 1(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v1i1.5863

Noto, M. S., Priatna, N., & Dahlan, J. A. (2019). Mathematical proof: The learning obstacles of preservice mathematics teachers on transformation geometry. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5379.117-126

Nugroho, A. A., Rahmawati, N. D., & Kartinah, K. (2018). Geometri transformasi [Transformation geometry]. UPGRS Press.

Nurcahyo, A., Ishartono, N., Pratiwi, A. Y. C., & Waluyo, M. (2024). Exploration of mathematical concepts in Batik Truntum Surakarta. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 457–476. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p457-476

Nurdiana, A., Tanod, M. J., & Adirakasiwi, A. G. (2021). Assessing didactic mathematical knowledge for teaching geometry transformation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1764(1), 012129. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012129

Rosita, C. D., Nopriana, T., & Silvia, I. (2019). Design of learning materials on circle based on mathematical communication. Infinity Journal, 8(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v8i1.p87-98

Sahara, S., Dolk, M., Hendriyanto, A., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2023). Transformation geometry in eleventh grade using digital manipulative batik activities. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp55-78

Sari, I. P., Suryadi, D., Herman, T., Dahlan, J. A., & Supriyadi, E. (2024). Learning obstacles on fractions: A scoping review. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 377–392. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p377-392

Siagian, M. D., Suryadi, D., Nurlaelah, E., & Prabawanto, S. (2022). Investigation of secondary students' epistemological obstacles in the inequality concept. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 14(4), 106–128.

Sulastri, R., Suryadi, D., Prabawanto, S., & Cahya, E. (2022). Epistemological obstacles on limit and functions concepts: A phenomenological study in online learning. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 14(5), 84–106.

Sunariah, L., & Mulyana, E. (2020). The didactical and epistemological obstacles on the topic of geometry transformation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3), 032089. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032089

Sundawan, M. D. (2018). Kajian kesulitan belajar mahasiswa dalam kemampuan pembuktian matematis ditinjau dari aspek epistemologi pada mata kuliah geometri transformasi [Study of students' learning difficulties in mathematical proof skills viewed from the epistemological aspect in the transformation geometry course]. Inspiramatika, 4(1), 13–26.

Suryadi, D. (2019). Penelitian desain didaktis (DDR) dan implementasinya [Didactic design research (DDR) and its implementation]. Gapura Press.

Tuffour, I. (2017). A critical overview of interpretative phenomenological analysis: A contemporary qualitative research approach. Journal of Healthcare Communications, 2(4), 52. https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-1654.100093

Uygun, T. (2020). An inquiry-based design research for teaching geometric transformations by developing mathematical practices in dynamic geometry environment. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(3), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00314-1